/* Google Analytics -seurantakoodi */

ARTICLE: What affects politicians’ media reputations?

Prime Minister Tony Blair, picture courtesy of Center for American Progress, licence CC BY-ND 2.0

How are political leaders treated by newspapers, and how does that affect the leaders’ popularity? Daniel Stevens, of University of Exeter, and Barbara Allen, of Carleton College compared the United States and United Kingdom by examining their leaders’ press coverage and election success.

The authors wanted to test three different theories.

  • Reinforcement: opposition supporters and incumbent supporters read different newspapers, which will further polarize the readers’ political views
  • Opposition media effects: opposition newspapers will undermine their readers’ opinion of the incumbent, but the incumbent-supporting press will not be able to bolster support among its readers
  • Issue ownership: the media effects depend on the incumbent’s political affiliation and the issue at hand – hawkish right-wing politicians suffer less from war coverage than left-wing politicians

Stevens and Allen analysed American and British governments’ approval ratings and election results. They were contrasted with data on different newspapers’ readerships and the papers’ coverage of the Iraq War. The two countries invaded Iraq together, but at the time the US was lead by a right-wing and the UK by a left-wing goverment.

The analysis found support for the issue ownership theory. UK’s left-wing leader, Tony Blair, had his reputation damaged more by the country’s conservative press than the right-wing George W. Bush was hurt by American left-wing leaning papers. This is due to war being an issue “owned” by right-wing parties – war coverage is easier to use to attack left-wing incumbents.

The incumbent-supporting newspapers (Republican leaning papers in the US, and Labour supporters in the UK) were unable to significantly improve their readers’ opinion of the incumbents. This result supports the opposition media effects hypothesis, but simultaneously refutes the reinforcement hypothesis.

The article “When Going to War Is Costly” was published by The International Journal of Press/Politics. The article is available online on the publisher’s website (free abstract).

Picture: Prime Minister Tony Blair, courtesy of Center for American Progress, licence CC BY-ND 2.0.

Share this postShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedIn1
Give us feedback